"THE BIG 6".
THESE SIX COMPANIES ARE:
OF THAT "BIG 6", TWO GAVE US AGENT ORANGE, TWO WERE INDICTED FOR WAR CRIMES, ONE PROVIDED BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO THE U.S. MILITARY AND WORKED ON THE ATOM BOMB, ONE STANDS ACCUSED OF USING PRIVATE MILITIAS TO COMMIT MURDER IN BRAZIL.
“The first task is population control at home…. One plan often mentioned involves the addition of temporary sterilants to water supplies or staple foods. Doses of the antidotes would be carefully rationed by the government to produce the desired population size”. (Paul Ehrlich, , 1968)
IT'S ABOUT GENE MANIPULATION.
FEW PEOPLE ARE AWARE WHAT THAT ENTAILS!
IT IS CHANGING THE NATURAL, THE KNOWN, INTO UNNATURAL AND UNKNOWN AND THERE IS NOT ONE VALID 30-YEAR STUDY THAT CAN PROVE THE GE/GMO FOODS ARE SAFE FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION.
THERE HAS BEEN JUST ONE "LONG-TERM" STUDY ON ANIMALS THAT SHOULD SCARE US ALL!
FROM AMERICA TO EUROPE AND ASIA, THERE ARE HUNDREDS OF STUDIES THAT SHOW THE DAMAGE GENETICALLY UNNATURAL FOODS CAUSE IN ANIMALS AND HUMANS.
EUROPEAN NETWORK OF SCIENTISTS FOR SCOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY:
No scientific consensus on GMO safety
As scientists, physicians, academics, and experts from disciplines relevant to the scientific, legal, social and safety assessment aspects of genetically modified organisms (GMOs), we strongly reject claims by GM seed developers and some scientists, commentators, and journalists that there is a “scientific consensus” on GMO safety and that the debate on this topic is “over”.
SCIENTIFIC, PEER-REVIEWED findings include:
Thousands of sheep, buffalo, and goats in India died after grazing on Bt cotton plants.
Mice eating GM corn for the long term had fewer, and smaller, babies.
More than half the babies of mother rats fed GM soy died within three weeks, and were smaller.
Testicle cells of mice and rats on a GM soy change significantly.
By the third generation, most GM soy-fed hamsters lost the ability to have babies.
Rodents fed GM corn and soy showed immune system responses and signs of toxicity.
Cooked GM soy contains as much as 7-times the amount of a known soy allergen.
Soy allergies skyrocketed by 50% in the UK, soon after GM soy was introduced.
The stomach lining of rats fed GM potatoes showed excessive cell growth, a condition that may lead to cancer.
"The Only published human feeding experiment revealed that the genetic material inserted into GM soy transfers into bacteria living inside our intestines and continues to function.
This means that long after we stop eating GM foods, we may still have their GM proteins produced continuously inside us. This could mean:
If the antibiotic gene inserted into most GM crops were to transfer, it could create super diseases, resistant to antibiotics.
If the gene that creates Bt-toxin in GM corn were to transfer, it might turn our intestinal bacteria into living pesticide factories."
IF YOU "FOLLOW THE MONEY" AND SEE WHO FINANCED THE AMERICAN STUDIES THAT SHOW GE/GM FOOD IS SAFE, YOU WILL FIND THOSE WHO ARE IN THE BUSINESS OF SELLING SUCH FOODS ARE THE FINANCIERS!
YOU HAVE TO LOOK FOR THE "PARENT ORGANIZATION" TO SEE THE TRUTH.
THE FAVORABLE "STUDIES" WON'T LIST MONSANTO OR ANY OTHER GM MEGA-COMPANY AS THE ONE WHO PAID THEM TO FIND THEIR "RESULTS", BUT TRACK BACKWARD AND YOU WILL EVENTUALLY SEE WHERE THE "STUDY" MONEY CAME FROM.
MONSANTO HAS BEEN CAUGHT AT THIS ALMOST AS MANY TIMES AS PHILIP MORRIS WAS CAUGHT FUNDING STUDIES THAT "FOUND" CIGARETTE SMOKE WAS HARMLESS!
MONSANTO HAS SPENT BILLIONS FIGHTING LABELING OF THEIR PRODUCTS!
IF THEY'RE SO SAFE, WHY HIDE THE FACT THEY'RE GENETICALLY MANIPULATED FRANKENFOODS FROM THE PUBLIC?
WE LABEL FOODS "MADE IN CHINA" OR "PRODUCT OF INDIA", WHY NOT "CREATED BY MONSANTO"?
AREN'T THEY PROUD OF THEIR NEW "DESIGNS" IN FOODS?
FOODS ARE LABELED "ORGANIC", AND THE ORGANIC FARMERS ARE DAMNED WELL PROUD TO HAVE THEIR FOODS SO LABELED!
WHY ISN'T MONSANTO, ET AL, JUST AS PROUD OF WHAT THEY GROW?
WE LABEL FOODS "GLUTEN FREE", "SUGAR FREE", "NO PRESERVATIVES", "NO MSG"!
WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE IF WE LABEL GM/GE FOODS WITH THEIR "DISTINGUISHED" TITLE...GENETICALLY MODIFIED!?
I, PERSONALLY, WOULD RATHER SEE A SKULL AND CROSSBONES ON GM/GE ANYTHING, OR A GRIM REAPER, BUT A SIMPLE "GMO" OR "GE" AT THE HEAD OF THE INGREDIENTS LIST WOULD BE GOOD!
GIVE US ALL A CHOICE!
LET US DECIDE!
THOSE WHO WANT FRANKENFOOD CAN BUY IT, BUT WE WHO DON'T CAN AVOID IT LIKE THE PLAGUE IT IS!
IF WE WENT AND LOOKED IN THE PANTRIES, FREEZERS, REFRIGERATORS OF THE CEOs OF MONSANTO AND COMPANIES LIKE IT, WOULD WE FIND EVEN ONE MORSEL OF GM/GE FOOD THERE?
WOULD THEY FEED IT TO THEIR CHILDREN?
LIKE IT OR NOT, HERE IS THE GENERAL CONSENSUS ON THE SAFETY OF GM/GE FOODS:
Eating genetically engineered (GE) corn has been strongly linked to serious health effects, including mammary tumors, kidney and liver damage.
Led by University of Caen molecular biologist Gilles-Eric Séralini, researchers tested the long-term health effects of feeding rats diets consisting of different percentages of Monsanto’s RoundUp-Ready corn, both from fields treated and not treated with the herbicide RoundUp.
They also tested the effects of RoundUp alone by comparing the health of rats fed a conventional (non-GE) corn diet with and without RoundUp added to their water, at the levels that have been found in tapwater or in GE feed.
The researchers found that rats fed GE corn and those whose water contained environmentally relevant levels of the herbicide RoundUp faced the following:
2 to 3 times more large tumors than the control group;
Females developed mammary and pituitary gland tumors, suffered pituitary gland abnormalities and hormone disruption;
Male rats also developed tumors, but in particular experienced serious kidney and liver damage;
50 percent of males and 70 percent of females died prematurely compared to 30 percent and 20 percent respectively in the control groups.
And the effects grew over time, so that by the beginning of the second year of the study, 50-80 percent of females in all treated groups had developed large tumors versus only 30 percent of the control group.
Why haven’t we heard of these kinds of results before?
BECAUSE THE COMPANIES WHO HOLD PATENTS ON GM SEEDS AND CROPS MUST APPROVE RESEARCH AND THEN GETS TO DECIDE IF THE FINDINGS GET PUBLISHED.
IT'S A LEGALLY BINDING CLAUSE AND THE COMPANIES ENFORCE IT MOST HERE IN THE USA.
To date we’ve only had a handful of short-term lab studies, almost none stretching longer than 90 days, the equivalent of adolescence in the study animals.
The kinds of tumors and organ damage found by the European scientists simply take more time to develop!
WOULDN'T MONSANTO ET AL KNOW THAT???
No single study can be definitive, but what Séralini’s work points to is the need to take very seriously, and more rigorously STUDY, the risks to human health posed by GE crops and foods.
And here’s the bigger news story: why is this the first long-term health study on the effects of eating GE foods ever to have taken place, despite their presence in our food supply for 15 years?
Unfortunately, independent research in the U.S. into the health effects of GE foods before they are released into our food supply has been virtually impossible.
The “Big 6” pesticide and biotech companies that manufacture and tightly control patents on GE products have suppressed and restricted research into the efficacy and health impacts of their products.
Licensing agreements expressly forbid research unless it has been approved by the patent-holders, and they retain and exercise the right to prevent publication when results are not as desired.
LET'S "ALL-CAPS" THAT!
"LICENSING AGREEMENTS EXPRESSLY FORBID RESEARCH UNLESS APPROVED BY THE PATENT-HOLDERS, AND THEY RETAIN AND EXERCISE THE RIGHT TO PREVENT PUBLICATION..." !
WHY WOULD THEY DO THAT IF THEY HAVE NOTHING TO HIDE?
Scientists have been complaining about this state of affairs since at least 1999.
More recently in 2010, a Scientific American editorial again noted both the lack of access and suppression of research.
Industry repeatedly insists that their GE products are safe, but they do so on the basis of studies that have never been repeated and have been criticized by independent scientists as deeply flawed.
Repeating a talking point is not the same thing as repeating a study.
Meanwhile, contrary to popular belief, U.S. regulators at the Food and Drug Administration do NOT require independent studies verifying safety before approving the release of these products into our food supply.
THE FDA SURE PLACES HIGH DEMANDS ON ORGANIC FARMERS, THOUGH!
WHY WOULD THE FDA ALLOW MONSANTO ET AL SO MUCH SLACK?
The Séralini study will draw predictable opposition from Dow and Monsanto as these companies rush new GE crops like 2,4-D-resistant corn to market.
GO READ THIS: http://www.panna.org/sites/default/files/GE_Backgrounder_FINAL.pdf
JUST SIX (6) CHEMICAL COMPANIES CONTROL 75% OF THE GLOBAL PESTICIDE/HERBICIDE INDUSTRY.
THESE SIX COMPANIES ARE:
MONSANTO ALONE CONTROLS ROUGHLY ONE-FOURTH OF THE GLOBAL SEED MARKET, AND SIXTY PERCENT OF THE U.S. CORN AND SOYBEAN MARKETS.
MONSANTO HAS BOUGHT OUT SMALLER SEED COMPANIES FOR YEARS AND HAS SLOWLY CHOKED THE MARKET FOR HEIRLOOM SEEDS!
WHY BUY AN HEIRLOOM SEED COMPANY AND THEN STOP SELLING ITS SEEDS?
VIRTUALLY 100% OF GE/GM CROPS ON THE MARKET ARE ENGINEERED WITH PESTICIDES INSIDE THE SEEDS, OR ARE ENGINEERED TO WITHSTAND HERBICIDES SPRAYED ON THEM!
THIS INCREASED THE USE OF PESTICIDES/HERBICIDES BY OVER 300 MILLION POUNDS IN JUST THE FIRST 13 YEARS OF GM/GE CROPS!
IF YOU CAN'T SEE WHAT THAT AMOUNT OF TOXIC POISONS PUMPED ONTO AMERICAN SOIL CAN DO, YOU MAY BE BLIND!
IT DOESN'T JUST STAY IN THE SOIL!
IT RUNS INTO OUR RIVERS, GROUNDWATER, AND WIND AND PLOWING SENDS IT INTO THE AIR!
LOOK UNDER THE RESOURCES SECTION OF THAT PDF!
LOOK AT THE DOZENS OF PEER-REVIEWED STUDIES REFUTING THE SAFETY OF GMOs, SHOWING THE FAILURES OF STUDIES THAT SHOW GM/GE FOOD IS, BY ANY MEANS, SAFE!
READ THE FACTS, THE PROVEN FACTS, ABOUT GMOs AND THEN GO FEED THEM TO YOUR CHILDREN?
NO ONE I KNOW WHO HAS READ JUST THIS PDF WOULD KNOWINGLY FEED GM FOODS TO THEIR CHILD!
WHEN A SCIENTIST WHO HAD FOR YEARS BEEN SO OPPOSED TO GM CROPS THAT HE RIPPED SOME FROM THE FIELDS CHANGED HIS STANCE, FOUR VERY BIG NAMES IN CROP SCIENCE WROTE SCATHING ARTICLES SHOWING THE FALLACIES OF WHAT HE NOW CALLS "SAFE CROPS"!
" Four excellent science- and evidence-based rebuttals have since appeared, authored by University of Michigan evolution professor, John Vandermeer; Union of Concerned Scientists’ Doug Gurian-Sherman; Dr. Brian John of UK’s Durham University; and Earth Island Journal’s Jason Mark.
DR. BRIAN JOHN HAD A LOT TO SAY TO REFUTE CLAIMS THAT GM/GE FOODS ARE SAFE, <CLICK HERE TO READ>
UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS' DOUG GURIAN-SHERMAN ALSO CAME OUT HARD AGAINST GM/GE FOODS. <READ HIS TAKE HERE>
LITERALLY HUNDREDS HAVE SLAMMED GM/GE CROPS SINCE THEY WERE INTRODUCED BECAUSE OF STUDIES THAT SHOWED THEIR DAMAGING EFFECTS ON LIVING ORGANISMS, THE ENVIRONMENT, AND THE ECONOMY OF THIRD-WORLD NATIONS, PLUS THEIR LACK OF LONG-TERM HEALTH EFFECT INDEPENDENT STUDIES.
THE DAMNABLE MAINSTREAM MEDIA WHORES, THAT'S WHO!
IF YOU SIMPLY "FOLLOW THE MONEY", YOU WILL SEE THAT THOSE WHO OWN OUR MEDIA ARE ALSO TIED TO THE MEGA-CORPORATIONS AND TO THE BIG NAMES OF THE STOCK MARKET.
EVERY DAY, "CORPORATE AMERICA" DECIDES WHAT NEWS TO FEED THE SHEEP IN THIS NATION!
AND EVERY DAY, THE SHEEP EAT IT UP!
ONLY WHEN TOLD TO QUESTION DO AMERICANS QUESTION MUCH OF ANYTHING!
"IF YOU WANT TO KEEP YOUR JOBS, OBEY YOUR TASKMASTERS, YOUR EMPLOYERS!"
I REFER YOU TO GEORGE ORWELL'S BOOK 1984.
THAT IS AMERICA TODAY!
EVEN the World Bank and U.N.-sponsored 'International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Scientific and Technology for Development'(IAASTD), authored by 400 scientists and development experts from over 80 countries highlighted the urgent need to undertake major shifts in governance, trade, finance and development policies in order to “feed the world.”
NOT GM CROPS!
AS MANY HAVE NOTED, GM/GE CROPS DO NOT INCREASE YIELD, AND THEY PLAY HELL WITH NECESSARY CROP DIVERSITY IN POOR NATIONS!
The way to really "feed the world" could ONLY be achieved, says the IAASTD, by rebalancing power in the food system, supporting small-scale farmers and advancing social equity.
The IAASTD — and numerous other U.N. reports — have also concluded that increasing investment in agroecological and diversified farming systems is crucial to meeting the closely interconnected climate, water, energy and food challenges of the 21st century.
The IAASTD Latin America report cites damage to the Amazon, the Cerrado in Brazil and the Yungas forest in Argentina from the expansion of GE soybean plantations there, and calls for measures prohibiting the transfer of GE seeds among countries that are centers of genetic diversity.
NOT GM CROPS!
After 25 years of research, 14 years of commercialization and millions of dollars in public funding, GENETIC ENGINEERING OF SEEDS AND PLANTS HAS FAILED TO DELIVER!
GE crops neither increase yield nor provide nutritional benefits.
U.S. land grant universities have even documented “yield drag” with losses of 5-10% in GE soy.
Virtually 100% of GE crops planted worldwide have been engineered to be used with herbicides or contain insecticidal toxins, or both, according to industry data.
<CLICK HERE FOR THAT DATA>
As superweeds and superbugs evolve resistance to GE crops and their associated pesticides, farmers resort to more chemical use, not less.
This is happening in the U.S., India, China and South Africa.
The latest analysis of data out of Washington State University shows that GE crops have driven up overall pesticide use across the country, contributing to a 527 million pound increase in herbicide use between 1996 and 2011. And last year alone, GE crops used 20 percent more pesticides on average than non-GE crops.
This is the pesticide industry’s dirty little secret:
GE seeds are engineered to be the growth engine of the world’s biggest pesticide companies, not the green solution to the world’s food needs.
[ACTUALLY, IT GOES EVEN DEEPER THAN THIS!]
ANY INDUSTRY THAT SPENDS BILLIONS OVER A 15-YEAR PERIOD TO FIGHT LABELING OF ITS PRODUCT, FIGHT LAWSUITS IN COURTS ALL OVER THE WORLD, OR TO SUE POOR FARMERS IN POORER NATIONS TO FORCE GM/GE CROPS ON THEM IS HIDING MORE THAN EVEN THE BEST STUDIES ON THE DANGERS OF GM/GE CROPS HAVE SHOWN!
Numbers 1 & 2 of the Big 6
AGENT ORANGE WAS MANUFACTURED FOR THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENCE BY MONSANTO CORPORATION AND DOW CHEMICAL.
IT WAS DEVELOPED BY THEM AS AN HERBICIDE/DEFOLIANT.
[SEE: Bruce Cumings (1998). The Global Politics of Pesticides: Forging Consensus from Conflicting Interests. Earthscan. p. 61.]
BAYER WAS LINKED SOLIDLY TO SUPPORTING NAZI EUGENICS STUDIES.
For almost three decades after WWII, BASF, Bayer and Hoechst (Aventis) filled its highest position, chairman of the board, with former members of the Nazi regime.
[SEE: Mark Sircus, Pharmaceutical Terrorism: The Backbone of Modern Medicine]
I.G. FARBEN WAS THE BAYER "PARENT COMPANY".
<READ MORE ON I.G.FARBEN/BAYER HERE>
WHAT WAS "ZYKLON" INITIALLY?
BAYER IS STILL IN THE "KILLING GAME"!
" The drug company Bayer sold millions of dollars worth of an intravenous blood-clotting medicine — Factor VIII concentrate, intended for hemophiliacs — to Asian, Latin American, and some European countries in the mid-1980s, although they knew that it was tainted with AIDS.
FDA regulators helped to keep the continued sales hidden, asking the company that the problem be “quietly solved without alerting the Congress, the medical community and the public,” according to the minutes of a 1985 meeting.
22 May 2003
An examination of internal Bayer company documents by The New York Times reveals that the company was engaged in unsavory, probably criminal marketing practices. The documents reveal that Bayer continued to sell contaminated blood plasma causing thousands of hemophiliac patients to be infected with AIDS. The company continued to sell the contaminated blood in Asia for over a year when it had already introduced a safer, heated blood plasma version in the US and Europe in February 1984.
The Sunday Times (UK below) focuses on a particularly hazardous pesticide experiment conducted on students at the Inveresk Institute in Edinburgh on behalf of the multi-national chemical corporation, Bayer AG, a company with a long and infamous history.
In testimony before the committee, The Alliance for Human Research Protection warned against the profound impact such illegitimate human experiments would have. The use of human beings in toxic chemical experiments strips them of human dignity and reduces them to utilitarian commodities. Pesticide experiments exploit poor people who are recruited to serve as means toward a commercial end without knowledge about the potential health hazards.
The chemical industry, led by Bayer CropScience, is attempting to roll back the moral principles of the Nuremberg Code with a back alley strategy. They would expose humans to toxic chemicals that kill pests, bugs, weeds and rodents--in order to obtain data for the purpose of contradicting animal study finding which currently provide EPA with the basis for establishing toxicity safety levels. Children are at special risk of harm from pesticides.
[See:Sunday Times (UK) Bayer promoting human pesticide experiments:
Sunday Herald (UK)
Number 4“The company [DUPONT] has consistently
treated the long-term interests of humanity as largely irrelevant" Curtis Moore, Former Counsel to the US Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works.
[SEE: Multinational Monitor, 3 (1990), cited in A SEED (1999) DuPont Profile, http://www.groundup.org/dupont/dp1.htm, viewed 31/3/02]
There is hardly a single chemical toxin in which DuPont has not played a major role in developing. “The company pioneered the production of sulphur dioxide, leaded petrol, CFC's and recently deep well injection of hazardous waste. The company then used dubious science, political manipulation and cover up to avoid restrictions on their use.”
DuPont began life as a gunpowder company and has made an incredible amount of money from arms manufacturing over the course of its existence.
The company has made major contributions to the development of plastic and other forms of explosives, gun and rocket propellants, chemical warfare and the atomic bomb.
During its 200 years of existence, DuPont has committed a staggering amount of corporate crimes.
Recently, the Dupont heir escaped doing jail time for raping his 3-year-old daughter.
BASF, ALSO PART OF THE OLD PARENT COMPANY OF I.G. FARBEN,
Also had corporate managers indicted for war crimes in Germany.
~BASF has caused major heavy metals pollution at multiple sites in America and even more abroad.
~ BASF (Largest chemical producer in the world)
Type of Crime: Antitrust
Criminal Fine: $225 million
12 Corporate Crime Reporter 21(1), May 24, 1999
BASF pled guilty and agreed to pay a $225 million criminal fine for leading a worldwide conspiracy to raise and fix prices and allocate market shares for certain vitamins sold in the United States and elsewhere.
In Dallas, the Department of Justice charged the company with conspiring to fix, raise, and maintain prices, and allocate the sales volumes of vitamins sold by them and other unnamed co-conspirator companies in the U.S. and elsewhere.
Federal officials also allege that the company allocated contracts for vitamin premixes for customers throughout the U.S. and rigged the bids for those contracts.
Vitamin premixes, which are used to enrich breakfast cereals and numerous other processed foods were also affected by the conspiracy, the Department said.
WHAT IS IN THOSE VITAMINS?
WE DON'T HAVE LABORATORIES IN OUR HOMES, SO WHO KNOWS?
~ BASF ordered to pay $500 million in Brazil pollution case.
~ Economic blackmail: In 1999, BASF threatened to move a paint manufacturing plant from Ontario, Canada, to Mexico if air pollution standards were raised.
~ BASF to Pay More than $1 Million to Correct Air Pollution at Wyandotte Plant.
BASF and all the others in the "Big 6" are cooperating with Monsanto Company in research, development and marketing of biotechnology.
THE BIG 6 HAVE A MONOPOLY ON THE GLOBAL FOOD SUPPLY!
THEY ARE ALSO MONOPOLIZING THE POLLUTION OF AMERICA!
REMEMBER THIS STATEMENT?
" WHO CONTROLS THE FOOD CONTROLS THE WORLD."
OR, AS HENRY KISSINGER SAID:
"Who controls the food supply controls the people; who controls the energy can control whole continents; who controls money can control the world."
National Security Study Memorandum 200:
Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests (NSSM200) was completed on December 10, 1974 by the United States National Security Council under the direction of Henry Kissinger.
It was adopted as official U.S. policy by President Gerald Ford in November 1975.
It was originally classified, but was later declassified and obtained by researchers in the early 1990s.
The basic thesis of the memorandum was that population growth in the least developed countries (LDCs) is a concern to U.S. national security, because it would tend to risk civil unrest and political instability in countries that had a high potential for economic development.
The policy gives "paramount importance" to population control measures and the promotion of contraception among 13 populous countries.
This is to control rapid population growth which the US deems inimical to the socio-political and economic growth of these countries and to the national interests of the United States, since the "U.S. economy will require large and increasing amounts of minerals from abroad", and these countries can produce destabilizing opposition forces against the United States.
Thirteen countries are named in the report as particularly problematic with respect to U.S. security interests:
India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Indonesia, Thailand, the Philippines, Turkey, Nigeria, Egypt, Ethiopia, Mexico, Colombia, and Brazil.
These countries are projected to create 47 percent of all world population growth.
The report advocates the promotion of education and contraception and other population control measures, stating for instance that "No country has reduced its population growth without resorting to abortion".
It also raises the question of whether the U.S. should consider preferential allocation of surplus food supplies to states that are deemed constructive in use of population control measures.
"Growing populations will have a serious impact on the need for food especially in the poorest, fastest growing LDCs.[least developed countries] While under normal weather conditions and assuming food production growth in line with recent trends, total world agricultural production could expand faster than population, there will nevertheless be serious problems in food distribution and financing.."
RIGHT THERE, SEE THAT UNDERLINED, HIGHLIGHTED STATEMENT?
EVEN THEN, ACTUAL FOOD SHORTAGE, THE INABILITY TO PRODUCE ENOUGH FOOD FOR FUTURE WORLD POPULATION WAS EXPLICITLY SHOWN TO BE A CREATED MYTH!
THIS WAS SAID 20 YEARS BEFORE WE HAD GENETICALLY MODIFIED CROPS!
WITHOUT GMOs, WE KNEW WE COULD FEED THE WORLD!
WE DIDN'T NEED "BETTER CROPS"!
WE NEEDED BETTER DISTRIBUTION!
"The U.S. economy will require large and increasing amounts of minerals from abroad, especially from less developed countries...
Whether through government action, labor conflicts, sabotage, or civil disturbance, the smooth flow of needed materials will be jeopardized. Although population pressure is obviously not the only factor involved, these types of frustrations are much less likely under conditions of slow or zero population growth."
SLOW OR ZERO POPULATION GROWTH!
"In these sensitive relations, however, it is important in style as well as substance to avoid the appearance of coercion."
[SEE FULL TEXT AT THIS GOVERNMENT SITE: http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PCAAB500.pdf ]
IT SEEMS TO ME THAT THE USA WAS LOOKING FOR MEANS TO DELIVER, AT LEAST , CHEMICALS THAT WOULD PROMOTE STERILIZATION...SOMETHING TO SLOW OR STOP POPULATION GROWTH.
KISSINGER SAID WE MUST NOT BE SEEN AS "COERCIVE".
SO WHAT IF AMERICA, VIA MONSANTO ET AL, LOOKED LIKE THE "SAVIOR OF HUMANITY" WITH INCREDIBLE HIGH-YIELD CROPS THAT WOULD PUT FOOD ON EVERY TABLE?
WHAT IF MONSANTO AND THE OTHERS WON'T ALLOW THE STUDIES OR THE PUBLICATION OF STUDIES THAT WILL BLOW THE WHISTLE ON WHAT'S REALLY GOING ON?
THAT'S A LOT OF WHAT-IFS, AND MAYBE I SEEM LIKE ONE OF THOSE CONSPIRACY THEORISTS, BUT WHEN I SEE THAT HERBICIDES AND PESTICIDES ARE SHOWING UP IN THE MAJORITY OF HUMAN BREAST MILK IN AMERICA, AND WHEN I KNOW THAT NO LONG-TERM STUDIES EXIST TO SHOW WHAT THE RESULTS OF INGESTING THESE GM/GE FOODS WILL BE IN 15 YEARS, 20 YEARS OR 30 YEARS, THEN SOMETHING SEEMS VERY ROTTEN!
THAT THE BIG 6 HAVE FOUGHT SO HARD JUST TO KEEP THEIR FRANKENFOODS FROM BEING LABELED TELLS ME THEY HAVE A DIRTY SECRET!
SO, ARE GMOs HARMLESS WONDERS THAT WILL SAVE THE WORLD FROM HUNGER?
The American Academy of Environmental Medicine (AAEM) doesn’t think so. The Academy reported that “Several animal studies indicate serious health risks associated with GM food,” including infertility, immune problems, accelerated aging, faulty insulin regulation, and changes in major organs and the gastrointestinal system. The AAEM asked physicians to advise patients to avoid GM foods.
Before the FDA decided to allow GMOs into food without labeling, FDA scientists had repeatedly warned that GM foods can create unpredictable, hard-to-detect side effects, including allergies, toxins, new diseases, and nutritional problems. They urged long-term safety studies, but were ignored.
THEN THE POWERFUL BOUGHT THE FDA.
ALL YOU HAVE TO DO TO SEE THIS IS TO LOOK AT THE POLITICAL-ECONOMIC WRANGLING THAT WENT ON AFTER THAT TO GET PEOPLE TO HEAD THE FDA, EPA, USDA WHO WERE AND ARE FRIENDLY TO THE "BIG 6" AND OTHER GIANTS WHO FORMED THE MONOPOLY OF OUR FOOD CROPS....PLANT AND ANIMAL FOOD.
WHY FIGHT SO HARD FOR CONTROL OF THE WORLD'S FOOD PRODUCTION?
WHY DEVELOP GM/GE FOODS WHEN WHAT WE HAD, AS KISSINGER ADMITTED, WOULD FEED THE WORLD IF WE COULD DISTRIBUTE IT PROPERLY?
I'VE WRITTEN ON EUGENICS BEFORE.
BUT HERE ARE QUOTES FROM SOME OF THE GLOBAL ELITE TO CLUE YOU IN:
CNN Founder Ted Turner….
“A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.”
Prince Phillip, the Duke of Edinburgh….
“If I were reincarnated I would wish to be returned to earth as a killer virus to lower human population levels.”
Planned Parenthood Founder Margaret Sanger….
“The most merciful thing that a family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.”
“Birth control must lead ultimately to a cleaner race.”
Thomas Ferguson, former official in the U.S. State Department Office of Population Affairs….
“There is a single theme behind all our work–we must reduce population levels. Either governments do it our way, through nice clean methods, or they will get the kinds of mess that we have in El Salvador, or in Iran or in Beirut.
Population is a political problem. Once population is out of control, it requires authoritarian government, even fascism, to reduce it….”
“And, advanced forms of biological warfare that can ‘target’ specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the world of terror into a politically useful tool”. (Dick Cheney and Paul Wolfowitz, “The Project for a New American Century: Rebuilding America’s Defenses”, p.60)
“The United Nations goal is to reduce population selectively by encouraging abortion, forced sterilization and control human reproduction and regards 2/3 of our human populations as excess baggage, with 350,000 people eliminated every day. It is a horrible thing to say, but it is just as bad not to say it”. (Jacques Cousteau, 1991, Aquatic Explorer and UNESCO Courier)
“…To cause by means of limited wars in the advanced countries, by means of starvation and diseases in the Third World countries, the death of three billion people by the year 2050, people they call “useless eaters”, ..The committee commissioned Cyrus Vance to write a paper on this subject of how to bring about such genocide. This paper was produced under the title “Global 2000 Report” and was accepted and approved for action by former President James Earl Carter, and Edwin Muskie, then Secretary of State, for and on the behalf of the U.S. Government. "Under the terms of the Global 2000 Report the population of the U.S. is to be reduced by 100 million by the year 2050." (Gerald O. Barney, The Global 2000 Report To The President, 1982)
AND AS OUR VILLAGE IDIOT, GEORGE W. BUSH SAID:
THE "BIG 6" POLLUTE AND STERILIZE WITH THEIR PESTICIDES AND THE MANUFACTURING PROCESSES TO MAKE THEM.
THE CROPS THEY GROW DO THE REST...
WHEN THE NUREMBERG TRIALS INVOLVED SOME OF THE VERY ONES WHO CONTROL SEEDS AND CROPS, WE SHOULD HAVE PAID ATTENTION.
WHEN WAR CRIMES WERE COMMITTED BY THOSE WE TRUST FOR FOOD, AND SECRET TESTS DONE ON HUMAN BEINGS SINCE THEN IN SCOTLAND, WE SHOULD HAVE WATCHED THEM MORE CLOSELY.
IF YOU WANT GM/GE FOODS, YOU EAT THEM.
I WANT TO KNOW WHERE THEY ARE SO I CAN AVOID THEM!
I SHOULD HAVE THAT RIGHT!